Initially, MOST was an instant favorite. Once I began to comb through the details, I noticed that using the MOST model would really help at-risk learners. The Bransford article explained the difficulties that at-risk learners had in traditional settings and promoted the benefits of MOST. I like that MOST supports a wide variety of learners with individual differences and that media is being used to help students retain important information. The possible barriers involved with using this model include lengthy lesson preparation time and knowledge gained by advanced learners. Designing a moderately challenging assignment is important when dealing with a model that is made for students that may not develop mentally as fast as their peers. If the lessons are not challenging to advanced learners, they may not retain the information needed for them to remain developmentally advanced. As long as teachers pay attention to the type of content introduced and assign groups accordingly, everyone should be challenged.
This model seems very interesting and would be great to use for inner-city K-8 students. I would love to sample this model. The only aspect that I would change in regards to MOST is the software used. This idea is old but we now have software that allows recording and clip arrangement to occur on one program.
Voicethread is a great tool that students can use while attempting assignments designed under the MOST framework. Bubbl.us is a brainstorming site where multiple users can share ideas and change the arrangement of one idea. 21st century tools are available to make MOST a better model and help all students learn by using media.
Paul,
ReplyDeleteI think it would be hard to challenge the advanced learners and the at-risk students if they were in the same class. I think this method helps to challenge everyone.